Saturday, November 23, 2024

Tag: Michael Fassbender

Macbeth (2015)

MacbethPoster

Title: Macbeth
Rating: R
Directed by: Justin Kurzel
Written by: Jacob Koskoff, Michael Lesslie and Todd Louiso
Based on the play by: William Shakespeare
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Marion Cotillard and Jack Madigan
Release Date: 12/4/2015
Running Time: 113 minutes

Official Facebook
IMDb

Macbeth, a Thane of Scotland, receives a prophecy from a trio of witches that one day he will become King of Scotland. Consumed by ambition and spurred to action by his wife, Macbeth murders his king and takes the throne for himself.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No


Steve Jobs Review – 4.5 out of 5 Stars

SteveJobsPoster
From the minute it begins to the minute it ends, Steve Jobs is alive. The world it creates is a sloppy, beautiful machine constantly on the verge of collapse, kept breathing by the arguments, confessions, jokes and triumphs of a variety of flawed yet fascinating people. With an outstanding cast, riveting dialogue and sharp filmmaking, Steve Jobs is not just a complex look into the life of its title character, it’s also an endlessly entertaining symbol for the way we view our own lives.

At this point, most people should at least be familiar with Apple founder Steve Jobs. He’s a modern icon and multiple documentaries and films have already been made about his life. Instead of repeating the by the book synopsis most of us already know, writer Aaron Sorkin and director Danny Boyle show Jobs through three different yet similar moments in his career.

SteveJobsReviewStill1

Every part of the movie takes place before Jobs is about to do a speech announcing one of his products. In the first act set in 1984, Steve Jobs (Michael Fassbender) is preparing with the help of his friend and confidant Joanna Hoffman (Kate Winslet) for a big speech to announce the Apple Macintosh. 40 minutes or so from going on stage, he faces difficulties including a glitch in his computer, requests from frustrated Apple co-creator Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogen), financial troubles involving his ex-girlfriend Chrisann (Katherine Waterston) and a young girl named Lisa who may or may not be his daughter. In the second act in 1988, Jobs is about to make a speech announcing his eventually disastrous NeXT computer. During this time, he deals with continuous fights with Wozniak and Chrisann as well as anger from being fired from Apple by his friend John Scully (Jeff Daniels). In the third and final act in 1998, a much older Jobs has returned to Apple and become the CEO. He confronts friends and foes one final time before his announcement of the game changing iMac computer.

Because of how the story is told, there isn’t a single moment of the movie that’s slow or giving you time to rest. From the first few seconds, people are talking and from then on there isn’t a scene that goes by where characters aren’t having conversations over a variety of subjects. Jobs and Hoffman will start talking in one room and then they’ll continue the conversation in the elevator and then by the time the conversation is over, they’ll be in a completely different room than when they started and then Jobs will begin talking to someone different. The movie is three streams of consciousness taking place from the point of view of the main character at these different points in his life.

This method could be obnoxious or unsatisfying in the hands of lesser writers, directors and actors but in the hands of such a talented crew, the way they set this up becomes rather brilliant. As I said at the start of the review, every moment in this world feels like it’s constantly on the verge of collapse. Each moment of the film is leading up to something that could significantly change the lives of the characters on screen. Steve Jobs and everyone around him are working down to the wire and they all seem like they’re on functioning on the edge. Watching these people unravel and fight under pressure can be chaotic and overwhelming, but it’s from its madness where the beauty of the movie comes from.

In the third act, Steve Jobs tells Hoffman that it seems like everyone waits until the last second to express their true feelings. This is a truthful line because to Sorkin, the chaos of this situation is us at our most human. Life can sometimes feel like we’re constantly waiting behind the scenes before a big show happens. It’s sloppy, unfiltered and its bits and pieces of anger, rage and arrogance mixed in with bits and pieces of love, humor and forgiveness. It’s never perfectly designed and oftentimes it can be hard to follow along with. One minute Jobs will be threatening to destroy Scully and the next second he’ll be wishing that they had kept their friendship alive. In one scene Jobs is the apple of his daughter’s eye and in the next she’s grown up to resent him. Everything in Steve Job’s life is temporary and there’s nothing around him that remains a certainty in the three points where we’re seeing him. There’s birth and death, and the in-between are these jumbled, imperfect cries for intimacy in a world that’s an unstoppable flood of data and information for you to pick up on and analyze. In Steve Jobs, the 40 minutes before the big event takes the absurdity and the uncertainty of life and shows it at its most bare and grandiose. The slow parts are cut out and what were left with is a pure rush of only the most horrifying and tragic and inspiring things that make us alive.

This storytelling also makes for an amazing interpretation of the type of person Steve Jobs was. At the end of the story, you’re not supposed to love or hate the guy. There are some times in this movie where you can make the argument that he was a terrible person. The relationship he had with Steve Wozniak is especially difficult to watch as Jobs refuses to respect and give credit to the person who arguably built most of the things that made him famous. Elements of the relationship he has with his ex-girlfriend and his daughter are disgusting as again, he has trouble treating them like they’re human beings. Still, there are also plenty of times where he tries to show sympathy and generosity with these very people. What makes this movie different from all the other biopics about flawed historical figures is that it doesn’t attempt to show Steve Job’s character arc as being some perfect, straightforward line that went up or down. The presentation of his life here is less like a summary and more like a series of photographs that aren’t in any real order.

You get to see moments of him being awful but you also get to see moments of him where he was trying to love and show respect to the people around him even when he couldn’t show it in the same way others did. It doesn’t try to make you judge him in any way; it only tries to show him as sincerely as possible. Amidst the tension of the events, we see a glimpse of a man who lived for that edge and never seemed to be able to understand a simple life. In the quest for immortality, he couldn’t become a good person on the inside and he could never live up to the hopes of the people around him for long periods of time. In the loud yells and arguments he built himself from, we see a lost soul who knows what he has become and tries at times to act like a good person even though knows he can’t sustain that behavior forever. He shares a hug with his daughter at the end of the 2nd act but you can tell in his eyes that he knows that the peace he feels in that moment won’t be around for long. The film version of Steve Jobs is a passionate, lively mess that was as successful as he was a failure.

Beyond the greatness of its story, the movie also has an ensemble for the books. Michael Fassbender kills it as Steve Jobs, he performs his accent perfectly and he does an astounding job delivering Sorkin’s dialogue at an energetic pace. It’s wasn’t so much a great Steve Jobs impersonation as it was an excellent portrayal of a conflicted person. After multiple failed projects, it’s also good to see Kate Winslet in another good movie giving an excellent performance. In the film, she has to carry a Polish accent and she manages to deliver the part with authenticity even though a lesser actor would’ve made it seem goofy or awkward. After Labor Day, Insurgent and Movie 43, Winslet was owed a movie of this level of quality. Though many adored her for her role in Inherent Vice (don’t get me wrong, I love that movie to death), I think it’s this movie that has finally made me realize what a talented actress Katherine Waterston is. In the first two acts, she is wonderful as the almost equally damaged mother of Jobs’ daughter. It’s usually a thankless role but she gives the part a lot of weight.

Lastly, I want to mention the two equally impressive supporting actor performances from Jeff Daniels and Seth Rogen. Both parts are great but for different reasons, one of them is playing the best version of a performance that they usually give and the other is doing something completely different than the other performances that they usually give. Seth Rogen is a man usually known for being the loud stoner but as Wozniak he plays against character and becomes the outspoken, humble “Ringo” to Jobs’ “John” as the movie puts it. He seems like one of the few people in the movie who is decent so when he finally erupts and fights Jobs about who really created Apple, it feels heavy and it gives Rogen room to deliver the best performance he has given in his career so far.

SteveJobsReviewStill2

Jeff Daniels is beginning to get type casted into playing the tough but fair boss in many of the shows and movie he’s in. Unlike Rogen, he plays the same part in Steve Jobs that he usually does but I think this part gives him much more to work with even though it’s not a part that’s seemingly unique for him. The fight scene he shares with Fassbender is topnotch acting from the both of them and a conversation he shares with Jobs at the end of the film was a pretty tragic testament to the inability to change the mistakes that were made in the past. When Daniels says something along the lines of “god I wish we worked together”, I’ll admit my eyes got a little bit misty.

Finally, I think Boyle and Sorkin deserve some credit for making something incredible even though there careers have been mostly hit and miss for me. I think both of them can make a good movie when they’re given good material to work off of. But when you leave both of them just to their own devices, you end up with something like The Newsroom or Trance. In the case of Steve Jobs, both of them seem to be balancing each other out so that their styles are present but never grating. Though it is very witty, Sorkin’s dialogue feels much less flashy than it has looked in the past. Boyle’s direction is still larger than life but it’s also a lot more restrained here than it was for his clearly manipulative work for Slumdog Millionaire. I thought one of them would screw this whole movie up for me but luckily it turned out to be a near close to perfect match.

In a rooftop scene near the end with Jobs and Lisa, he has a heartbreaking line where he tells his daughter that he was poorly made. This candid moment brings together the true message behind the entire film. Through all the eccentricities, Steve Jobs was just one of billions of people looking for purpose in a world without any.

Though it isn’t the all-time masterpiece The Social Network was, Steve Jobs is still spectacular. There is so much about the movie to love and from start to finish it’s this emotional ride that at times even took me away from the fact that I was in a crowded theater. In three briefs glimpses into another world, Sorkin and Boyle take us into the heart of a flawed yet beautiful individual.

Rating:[star rating=”4.5″ numeric=”yes”]

Review by: Ryan M.

Release Date: 10/23/2015

Rating: R

Cast: Michael Fassbender, Kate Winslet, Seth Rogen, Jeff Daniels, Michael Stuhlbarg, Katherine Waterston , and Perla Haney-Jardine

Directed by: Danny Boyle

Screenplay by: Aaron Sorkin

Based on the Book by: Walter Isaacson

Steve Jobs (2015)

SteveJobsPoster

Title: Steve Jobs
Rating: R
Directed by: Danny Boyle
Written by: Aaron Sorkin
Based on the book by: Walter Isaacson
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Kate Winslet, Seth Rogen and Jeff Daniels
Release Date: 10/23/2015
Running Time: 122 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

Set backstage at three iconic product launches and ending in 1998 with the unveiling of the iMac, Steve Jobs takes us behind the scenes of the digital revolution to paint a portrait of the man at its epicenter.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No


Slow West (2015)

SlowWestPoster

Title: Slow West
Rating: R
Director: John Maclean
Writer: John Maclean
Stars: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Michael Fassbender and Caren Pistorius
Release Date: 4/16/2015
Running Time: 84 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

‘Slow West’ follows a 16-year-old boy on a journey across 19th Century frontier America in search of the woman he loves, while accompanied by mysterious traveler Silas.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No

Note: As the credits end, we hear the wind and soft buzzing of insects.

Special thanks to Frank S. for this submission


Frank (2014)

FrankPoster

TITLE: Frank

RELEASE DATE: 5/9/2014

RATING: R

Jon, a young wanna-be musician, discovers he’s bitten off more than he can chew when he joins an eccentric pop band led by the mysterious and enigmatic Frank.

What did you think of this film?


Official Site

Amazon

IMDb


During Credits? No

After Credits? No

NOTE: Dedicated to Chris Sievey (1955-2010) whose outsider spirit and big fake head inspired this film.

Frank Review – 3 1/2 out of 5 Stars

FrankPoster
Before going into full detail, I think everyone needs to check out whatever soundtrack there is for this movie. The movie is filled with great songs and in the finale the film features a song called “I Love you All” and it sparks one of the best scenes of the year for film. I really hope they can campaign that song for the Academy Award because that would be awesome to see. Here’s a link to the song, I highly recommend it:

Frank tells the story of an experimental band that is run by a crazed song writing genius named Frank (Michael Fassbender) who wears a paper Mache mask. The band loses its pianist and by coincidence hires young, independent songwriter Jon (Domnhall Gleeson). The movie mostly shows Jon’s evolution with the band from there studio to their performance at SXSW.

The movie uses a very stereotypical format for its story of the evolution of the band. There is the breakup of the band. Some of the people of the band start to care about themselves than about the music. And ultimately, the band gets back together again through the power of a song. The films storyline is one we have seen time and time again in all band movies. Besides that, the film manages to bring up a slew of other conveniences that we have seen before. I would even go as far as to call the main character Jon a wet blanket on the movie but I think that the great performances, cool soundtrack and strange interest of the dialogue made this something that was quite original.

FrankReviewStill1

As Frank, Michael Fassbender gives one of his best performances to date. We only see his face for ten minutes of screen time give or take but he is energetic and wild before then. Fassbender adds large amounts of tragedy and hilarity to the character in a way that really makes it his own. It is one of the most memorable performances of the year so far. Frank himself is a worthy and touchingly created main character. He is loopy and weird but you get this sense that there is something much more to him psychologically both negatively and positively. He is a character with a performance that is worthy of a movie.

I enjoyed Maggie Gyllenhaal as Frank’ sidekick Clara. She is very domineering and hateful to Jon throughout the film. I think she works for the role that she has to play. Scott McNairy is the bands manager and is the nicest person to Jon. He is one of the more grounded people of the movie while stilling playing to the strangeness of the movie; I think I would’ve actually liked it better if he was the main character.

Speaking of which, I think Jon is the weakest aspect of the film by far. First of all, Domhnall Gleeson isn’t that bad in the movie. He is fine as to playing to the character that the movie writes and he even added moments of dimension and sympathy. What I hated about the character is how obvious it felt that they were using him as a way to keep the movie grounded. The rest of the people featured have really cools quirks so the writer compensates by making the lead as flat and inside the box as they can. He never seems to learn anything and there isn’t a point where he really seems to do anything that is nicer or more memorable than what any other character is doing. He isn’t terrible at anything, he is simply ok. Domhnall plays Jon with a lot of subtlety which makes him extremely normal. The fact that our main character holds this trait really does an injustice to the story being told. If the movie wanted to take that route they should’ve picked a more intense actor (no offense to Gleeson) or presented us with a character that still managed to be interesting despite being a clear plot device. Frank feels like The Big Lebowski if the main character wasn’t The Dude and instead was an average and forgettable young adult character that seemed to avoid the weird things happening around him. He just feels like such a roadblock to this movie.

I did find the dialogue to be very funny at times. It builds many of the characters and manages to be dark, funny and touching at the same time. The movie for me is about creativity beyond everything else. The movie tries to go into the mind of a group of artists trying to explore the deepest depths of their mind and the troubles they face in attempting to do so. You can become too controlling, you can have a lack of focus or you can simply not have what it takes. I really enjoyed what this film did in attempting to figure out what really leads artists to do the work that they create.

FrankReviewStill2

Frank is a fairly decent movie. Its main character is weak and it drags a little near the end but all comes back around to having good music, good performances and charming and interesting themes and dialogue. I would give this a shot when it comes out to theaters or at least when it comes out to on demand.

Rating:[star rating=”3.5″ numeric=”yes”]

Review by: Ryan M.

Release Date: 4/4/2014

Rating: NR

Cast: Michael Fassbender, Domhnall Gleeson, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Scoot McNairy

Directed by: Leonard Abrahamson

Screenplay by: Jon Ronson and Peter Straughan

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)*

XMenDaysOfFuturePastPoster7

TITLE: X-Men: Days of Future Past (aka. X-Men: Days of Future Past in 3D)

RELEASE DATE: 5/23/2014

RATING: PG-13

The X-Men send Wolverine to the past in a desperate effort to change history and prevent an event that results in doom for both humans and mutants.

What did you think of this film?


[wpolling id=”6″ ]


Official Site

IMDb


During Credits? Yes

during the credits
In the DVD Rogue Cut release, there is a scene not shown in theaters where we see Trask lying in the cell in the Pentagon.

After Credits? Yes

after the credits
The camera pans across a desert and focuses on a robed person on a ledge with hundreds of people below chanting “En Sabah Nur”. The camera zooms in on this person and they are conducting large Tetris-like pieces into place to make the Great Pyramids. As it gets closer, it pans around to see a grey, male (Asian versions of the film show a female) face (of a young Apocalypse) and four mysterious figures on horseback perched on a cliffside to his left.

Is this stinger worth waiting around for? NoYes (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Special thanks to Myra for clarifying and verifying this scene

Counselor, The (2013)

TheCounsellorPoster

TITLE: The Counselor

RELEASE DATE: 10/22/2013

RATING: R

A lawyer finds himself in over his head when he gets involved in drug trafficking.

What did you think of this film?


Official Site

Amazon

IMDb


During Credits? No

After Credits? No

NOTE: In memory of Matt Baker.


12 Years a Slave (2013)

12YearsASlavePoster

TITLE: 12 Years a Slave

RELEASE DATE: 10/31/2013

RATING: R

In the antebellum United States, Solomon Northup, a free black man from upstate New York, is abducted and sold into slavery.

What did you think of this film?


Official Site

Amazon

IMDb


During Credits? No

After Credits? No

NOTE: For Philbert John McQueen.


Prometheus (2012)*

TITLE: Prometheus

RELEASE DATE: 6/8/2012

RATING: R

A team of explorers discover a clue to the origins of mankind on Earth, leading them on a journey to the darkest corners of the universe. There, they must fight a terrifying battle to save the future of the human race.

What did you think of this film?


Official Site

Amazon

IMDb


During Credits? No

After Credits? Yes

during the credits
We see the text: “Previous footage property of Weyland Corporation“, along with the Weyland logo, website and the date “10. 11. 12.“.  The website is: http://www.weylandindustries.com/timeline.

Is this stinger worth waiting around for? NoYes (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Special thanks to Graham for this submission