Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Tag: Thriller

Remaining, The (2014)

Title: The Remaining
Rating: PG-13
Directed by: Casey La Scala
Written by: Casey La Scala and Chris Dowling
Starring: Johnny Pacar, Shaun Sipos, Bryan Dechart, Alexa PenaVega, Italia Ricci and Liz E. Morgan
Release Date: 9/24/2014
Running Time: 88 minutes

Official Facebook
IMDb

A group of close friends gather for a wedding, but the celebration is shattered by a series of cataclysmic events and enemies foretold by biblical end-times prophecies. The survivors face a horrifying, uncertain future as they scramble for safety, but as their world collapses around them in chaos and terror will they choose real life through faith, or just try to survive?


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No


Invitation, The (2015)

Title: The Invitation
Rating: NR
Directed by: Karyn Kusama
Written by: Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi
Starring: Logan Marshall-Green, Emayatzy Corinealdi and Michiel Huisman
Release Date: 4/8/2016
Running Time: 100 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

In this taut psychological thriller by Karyn Kusama (Girlfight, Jennifer’s Body), the tension is palpable when Will (Logan Marshall-Green, Prometheus) shows up to a dinner party hosted by his ex-wife Eden (Tammy Blanchard, Into the Woods) and new husband David (Michiel Huisman, “Game of Thrones”). The estranged divorcees’ tragic past haunts an equally eerie present; amid Eden’s suspicious behavior and her mysterious house guests, Will becomes convinced that his invitation was extended with a hidden agenda. Unfolding over one dark evening in the Hollywood Hills, The Invitation blurs layers of mounting paranoia, mystery, and horror until both Will—and the audience—are unsure what threats are real or imagined.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No


Kill Your Friends (2015)

KillYourFriendsPoster

Title: Kill Your Friends
Rating: NR
Directed by: Owen Harris
Written by: John Niven
Based on the novel by: John Niven
Starring: Ed Skrein, Nicholas Hoult and Rosanna Arquette
Release Date: 4/1/2016
Running Time: 103 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

As the twentieth century breathes its very last, with Britpop at its zenith, twenty-seven-year-old A&R man Steven Stelfox (Hoult) is slashing and burning his way through London’s music industry. Blithely crisscrossing the globe in search of the next megahit—fueled by greed and inhuman quantities of drugs and alcohol—Stelfox freely indulges in an unending orgy of self-gratification. But the industry is changing fast, the hits are drying up, and the only way he’s going to salvage his sagging career is by taking the idea of “cutthroat” to murderous new levels.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No


Girl in the Photographs, The (2015)*

TheGirlInThePhotographsPoster

Title: The Girl in the Photographs
Rating: R
Directed by: Nick Simon
Written by: Robert Morast, Osgood Perkins and Nick Simon
Starring: Christy Carlson Romano, Katharine Isabelle and Claudia Lee
Release Date: 4/1/2016
Running Time: 95 minutes

IMDb

Big-city glamour clashes with small-town values — and a killer’s knife — in The Girl in the Photographs, a bloody cocktail from director Nick Simon and executive producer/​​horror master Wes Craven that is in equal parts an homage to the slasher genre and a clever manipulation of its tropes.

Colleen (Claudia Lee), a bored young woman in a sleepy community called Spearfish, starts receiving photographs of brutally murdered young women. Are they real or staged? The culprit is either a serial killer or some creep with a sick sense of humour, not that the cops are doing much about it either way. But when news of the twisted photo campaign hits the internet, famous LA-based celebrity photographer Peter Hemmings (clearly a tip to David Hemmings’ shutterbug character in Blow-Up, and played to hilariously arrogant perfection by Kal Penn) decides to take a trip back to his hometown, Spearfish, to investigate.

Hemmings and his entourage of self-centred models, assistants, and hangers-on descend upon the town and immediately disrupt Colleen’s dull existence. Hemmings takes a special interest in Colleen, much to the chagrin of his cool-as-ice model girlfriend (Miranda Rae Mayo). As the killer targets Colleen’s friends and closes in on her, Hemmings and his posse seem to present an enticing escape.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? Yes

during the credits
Some photos from the photo shoot are shown.
TheGirlInThePhotographsSS1

 

After Credits? No

Is this stinger worth waiting around for? NoYes (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Dedication: For Wes


Clan, The (2015)

TheClanPoster

Title: The Clan
Rating: R
Directed by: Pablo Trapero
Written by: Julian Loyola, Esteban Student and Pablo Trapero
Starring: Guillermo Francella, Peter Lanzani and Lili Popovich
Release Date: 8/13/2015
Running Time: 110 minutes

IMDb

The true story of the Puccio Clan, a family who kidnapped and killed people in the 80s.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No

Special thanks to Frank S. for this submission


They’re Watching (2016)*

TheyreWatchingPoster

Title: They’re Watching
Rating: NR
Directed by: Jay Lender and Micah Wright
Written by: Jay Lender and Micah Wright
Starring: Mia Faith, Kris Lemche and David Alpay
Release Date: 3/25/2016
Running Time: 95 minutes

Official Site
IMDb
Buy on Amazon

While filming a home improvement reality show in Eastern Europe, an American reality show crew gets caught in a centuries-old web of revenge, horror, and blood, when the home buyer is attacked by local villagers who believe she is a witch.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? Yes

during the credits
We see Greg and Vladimir play a song in the restaurant.

 

After Credits? Yes

after the credits
We hear Alex say “Eat your goat dick and shut up!”

Is this stinger worth waiting around for? NoYes (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Memoriam: In Loving Memory of Adrian Papa 1988 – 2013


Divergent Series: Allegiant – Part 1, The (2016)

untitled-6918.dng

TheDivergentSeriesAllegiantPart1Poster

Title: The Divergent Series: Allegiant – Part 1 (aka. The Divergent Series: Allegiant: The IMAX Experience)
Rating: PG-13
Directed by: Robert Schwentke
Written by: Noah Oppenheim, Adam Cooper and Bill Collage
Based on the book by: Veronica Roth
Starring: Shailene Woodley, Theo James, Naomi Watts, Octavia Spencer, Jeff Daniels, Zoë Kravitz, Ansel Elgort and Miles Teller
Release Date: 3/18/2016
Running Time: 121 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

After the earth-shattering revelations of INSURGENT, Tris must escape with Four and go beyond the wall enclosing Chicago. For the first time ever, they will leave the only city and family they have ever known. Once outside, old discoveries are quickly rendered meaningless with the revelation of shocking new truths. Tris and Four must quickly decide who they can trust as a ruthless battle ignites beyond the walls of Chicago which threatens all of humanity. In order to survive, Tris will be forced to make impossible choices about courage, allegiance, sacrifice and love.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No

[wpolling_archive id=”75″ vote=”true” type=”open”]


London Has Fallen Review – .5 out of 5 Stars

LondonHasFallenPoster
Several years after the events of Olympus Has Fallen, we return to top US Secret Service agent Mike Banning (Gerard Butler) and President Benjamin Asher (Aaron Eckhart) in London Has Fallen. When a prime minster passes away in London, all of the top prime ministers gather in London in order to see the funeral. When they get there, it turns out that the funeral was a trick to blow up the city and kill all of the prime ministers. Asher and Banning manage to get away and they must hide within the city in order to survive.

When London Has Fallen ended, I had one question to ask myself. Have I become too arrogant and pretentious to enjoy a film like this? I remember back in 2013 when I saw Olympus Has Fallen in the theaters and while I haven’t watched it since, I think I at least found that movie to be somewhat entertaining as far as dumb action movies go. So why do I have so many problems with this sequel that in a lot of ways captures the dumb action beats of the first film?

To respond, let me put it this way, there’s a difference between making a fun movie that’s stupid and a movie that’s just stupid. White House Down and Pan are two very idiotic films that I find quite enjoyable because there’s a certain charm and ambition to both of these two movies that gives them a lot of heart even when they fail. On the other hand, films like this or Fant4stic are dumb but they’re also incredibly hollow and soulless. You watch London Has Fallen and you get the since that whatever passion and joy they had making the original was gone from this new project. Nobody wanted to make an interesting movie and everyone goes into the movie from an angle of pure cynicism. London Has Fallen is a poorly written, ugly and forgettable action flick that even finds a way to become despicably racist.

The movie screws everything up within literal minutes of the opening credits. The film starts with a drone strike that kills the entire friends and family of the Middle Eastern antagonist. The drone sent by the US was meant to take out this man but they made a mistake and because of this he survives while innocent people are killed. This is the dark backstory that they give the bad guy and you think they would use this to make you sympathize with him. They are probably going to use the character to question the morality of our supposed heroes. Except that they don’t. They make the villain completely unsympathetic and even after revealing the horrific drone strike that killed his loved ones, the heroes in this movie go out of there to show zero sympathy for this person. (Spoiler alert for something sh*tty that deserves to be spoiled) The happy ending to the film is even them successfully saving the day by going through with a more successful drone strike.

Mike Banning brutally tears through the generic Middle Eastern baddies with sadistic one liners and grotesque apathy for the villains around him. I usually wouldn’t have a problem with one liners and the over the top deaths of henchmen. But there’s two things that make these details horrific when done here. The first thing is that the murders in this movie are overly drawn out and disgusting. In one scene, Banning slowly tortures the brother of the villain and seems quite happy slowly twisting his knife into this man who is screaming out for mercy. And at this point, the movie is still playing this as this good, fun thing that is happening. I’m reminded of a moment in this action movie satire called Decker where the main character waterboards a henchmen and it’s set to this cheerful, heroic music. This scene was like that moment if it was played genuinely. When the scene ends, it’s supposed to be humorous to the audience when Banning calls the president a wimp for telling him that the previous death was needlessly cruel. The apathy of Banning as a character also stretches out to when he’s making these unfunny jokes at the expense of the millions of people who just died. All the killings in this movie feel way too graphic and realistic to be entertaining and it makes the hero less sympathetic and the action scenes unnecessarily hard to sit through.

The second thing that makes this movie sadistic is in the message it presents to the audience about drone strikes. If they gave the villain a more one dimensional backstory, I would be okay with the over the top deaths with cheesy one liners. But no, they had to give the villain the background of a legitimate problem that needs to be dealt with utter seriousness. By making the victims of collateral damage these one note, unsympathetic animals, they are telling the audience that all drone strikes done by the US to the middle east are absolutely fine, even if they harmed innocent people. The problem isn’t even that it falls on the side of the US, it’s how unapologetically it falls onto the side of the US. It doesn’t even matter what country these people are from, we should just be bombing people from these countries. There is an actual line of dialogue in this movie where our hero says to a villain, “go back to f*ckheadistan”. The people damaged by these unprofessional attacks are pure evil and they deserved what they got.

In all my years writing reviews, I’ve tried to avoid using flashy, extreme words to describe subjects. But for the first time ever, I have found a movie on my site that I would call truly racist. London Has Fallen is an utterly racist piece of cinema. It paints all of the Middle East as one note villains and it justifies real life, horrific actions against a majority of the people whether that’s torture or drone strikes. There will be people out there who will watch this movie and they’ll use it to justify deeply rooted beliefs. The original Olympus Has Fallen was just a dumb action flick but this movie tackles real life subject matter and ends up either intentionally or unintentionally expressing a deeply disturbing view of how a lot of Americans see people from the Middle East. Deadpool and Kingsman: The Secret Service are over the top, bloody action films but the deaths in those movies are clearly meant to be tongue in cheek. In London Has Fallen, the violence crosses the line and morphs into something much more sinister.

Beyond that issue of being a wee bit racist, the movie is just bad on all accounts. The action scenes are mundane at best and unwatchable at worst. The shaky, close up action in this movie gave me serious flashbacks to A Good Day to Die Hard and I ended up zoning out throughout most of them. The visual effects for the film look like they come from a 2004 movie. The comedy in this movie wouldn’t even make it onto a bad CBS sitcom and when the jokes don’t feel artificial, they feel sadistic as I’ve already mentioned above. The performances are all atrocious. Gerard Butler brings no enthusiasm to a character that already feels soulless. The movie also wastes several beloved character actors that all apparently needed another paycheck. I know they had to find a way to pay for their yachts but come on Robert Forester; you were Max Cherry in Jackie Brown. You’re seriously telling me you can’t find something better to do that this pile of trash? And of course, the movie kills off millions of people like it’s no big deal and seriously expects us to give a damn about whether or not the president is going to make it. It doesn’t matter if every other prime minister is murdered; we only care about ‘murica. In a movie like G.I. Joe: Retaliation, that would be the most arrogant thing that an action movie could do. For London Has Fallen, that’s just a footnote.

I had watched Zootopia before this movie and it was certainly an odd double feature. Zootopia was a kid’s movie that advocated breaking down misconceptions and finding tolerance for the people around you that are different. London Has Fallen was an adult movie that advocated seeing the Middle East as this one ugly figure that it’s okay to brutally attack in morally dubious ways. I know one is aimed for children but that’s the one that clearly seems more mature than the other. London Has Fallen is a badly made, badly written and badly acted movie. But even if I let that slide, it contains perhaps the worst message I’ve ever seen from a movie that I’ve had to review for this site. Beyond the ugly cynicism of Black Mass or even the nauseating laziness of A Good Day to Die Hard, this might be the worst. I hated this movie and it must be avoided at all costs. Hopefully, London Has Fallen represents where we are right now and Zootopia represents what we can become in the future.

Rating:[star rating=”.5″ numeric=”yes”]

Review by: Ryan M.

Release Date: 3/4/2016

Rating: R

Cast: Gerard Butler, Aaron Eckhart and Morgan Freeman

Directed by: Babak Najafi

Screenplay by: Creighton Rothenberger, Katrin Benedikt, Christian Gudegast and Chad St. John

Son of Saul Review – 4.5 out of 5 Stars

SonOfSaulPoster
From the moment Son of Saul begins, it had me so hooked to the screen that I don’t think I ever took the time to blink for the whole two hours. First time filmmaker László Nemes has created a captivating and haunting portrait of the holocaust that is as terrifying as it is intimate. Son of Saul takes on a difficult story and it presents it in a way that’s damn near perfect.

Son of Saul takes place in the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II. We follow Saul (Géza Röhrig), a Hungarian prisoner who helps to burn the dead bodies of others in order to survive. Saul finds the corpse of a boy in the showers that he believes to be his son and in the following days he searches for a rabbi who can give his boy a proper burial.

I usually try to stay away from hyperbole, but Son of Saul is shot in a way that I’ve never seen done before. The entire time, we are seeing the horrors of the holocaust from the point of view of Saul. The movie almost always stays directly in front of Saul and you experience the terrors of this event by following this character around. The movie only takes place in these close ups and because of this, all of the violence and brutality happens either off screen or way off in the background.

But that’s not to say the movie spares you the details of the things that happened at this camp. There is no music in the movie so you can hear every scream, every gunshot and every movement that is going on around Saul. In the opening scene, we only see Saul’s face but we can hear the screams of the people on the other side of the wall that are dying in the gas chambers. The violence we see in the film is even more horrifying to experience due to how restrained it feels. In order to survive, Saul must live with the things he has done and he must become numb to the pain and suffering that surrounds him. Géza Röhrig gives a masterfully subtle performance as a quiet man beaten and left close to broken by the things he has seen. He never screams or yells but you can still tell the pain this man feels deep down. The bodies piled up in mounds and the screaming children become blurry things in the background with his face being the main focus of the screen. In this way, Son of Saul does an astounding job showing you the mindset of the victims of the holocaust and you can in some way see the tragedy through their eyes. You might not be seeing every single detail but in doing so; you further comprehend the confusion and the claustrophobia that Saul went through inside the camp.

SonOfSaulReviewStill1

Furthermore, the aspect ratio for the movie doesn’t take up the full screen. The movie is compressed into this box as opposed to the wider shots you might see in a film like The Revenant or Mad Max: Fury Road. This allows you to become trapped inside the movie and you feel restrained and locked in with this character while you’re watching the movie. The movie has managed to capture an unspeakable act of horror in a way that feels both respectful and unsettlingly honest to how life was in this time and place in history. The movements, the sounds and the lighting give you the feeling of being surrounded by ugliness and not knowing if each day will be your last. The movie is purposefully exhausting to sit through and like Saul himself, you are never spared a moment of rest from what is taking place.

Beneath the powerful direction and bleak honesty, what made Son of Saul truly impressive to me was how beautiful its final message was. Don’t get me wrong, this is a very grueling and relentless film to watch and it doesn’t end on a note of pure joy. But it becomes clear near the end of the film that the son of Saul might not actually be the son of Saul. The proper burial of the boy is more of a symbol of Saul’s final attempt of finding light and hope for humanity. In this hellish landscape with violence and anger surrounding him, he searches for anybody willing to give him a quick moment of compassion or sympathy for his quest. A doctor promises him the body of his son instead of giving it an autopsy. A soldier turns the other way to save Saul’s life. These small moments of rest are few and far between but when they do happen, they mean the world to our main character. Son of Saul takes possibly the worst event in the 20th century, shoots in the most terrifying way possible and still attempts to find human decency in the compact, tiny frames.

SonOfSaulReviewStill2

The final scene in the movie without giving anything away is bittersweet. On one hand, Saul is a doomed man and the people around him are bound to die like the millions of people just like them. But on the other hand, Saul finds something that undoubtedly proves that there is still beauty and wonder in the world. Someday, all the victims and the killers will be dead and their perspectives will be long forgotten. But maybe, we can find hope in the generations after that. Just maybe, the children of that time period will grow up and they will have the chance to make different decisions and actions and live in a world that doesn’t have to worry about the problems these people had to face. Saul sees the potential for a new world and though his story is coming to a close, this is something that fills him with overwhelming happiness. The movie tells a dark story, but you leave the movie feeling released because the spirits of an atrocious act can find peace and warmth in the hopes and dreams of the future. Horror is constant in our world, but love and beauty will always come with it. Saul’s final expression in this movie says it all and it’s the look of a man who can finally rest.

Son of Saul is a close to perfect in handling its upsetting subject matter. The direction in the film is flawless and it blows my mind that such daring, brilliant filmmaking could come from a first time director. Every movement in this movie dares to put you right there with them and it absorbs the audience. Son of Saul is about the darkness and the intensity of the holocaust. But beyond that, it’s also about finding the small things in a tragedy that prove the wonder of human nature even as the walls are closing in on you.

Rating:[star rating=”4.5″ numeric=”yes”]

Review by: Ryan M.

Release Date: 12/18/2015

Rating: R

Cast: Géza Röhrig, Levente Molnár and Urs Rechn

Directed by: László Nemes

Screenplay by: László Nemes and Clara Royer

10 Cloverfield Lane (2016)

John Goodman as Howard, Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Michelle, and John Gallagher Jr. as Emmett in 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE, by Paramount Pictures

10CloverfieldLanePoster

Title: 10 Cloverfield Lane
Rating: PG-13
Directed by: Dan Trachtenberg
Written by: Josh Campbell, Matthew Stuecken and Damien Chazelle
Starring: John Goodman, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and John Gallagher Jr.
Release Date: 3/11/2016
Running Time: 105 minutes

Official Site
IMDb

After getting in a car accident, a woman is held in a shelter by two men, who claim the outside world is affected by a widespread chemical attack.


What did you think of this film?

During Credits? No

After Credits? No

Note: Contrary to what director Dan Trachtenberg said in a recent Reddit AMA, there are no extras.

[wpolling_archive id=”74″ vote=”true” type=”open”]